bethh213 said:For the person worried about the girls??? Newsflash....young white girls love black cock too!!![]()
I am not disputing that. Neither am I knocking scarf's prolific body of work.
What I am saying is some of the girls look very underage. I believe this domain went down once because someone posted underage pictures. I could be wrong about that. But when the site came back up the first two clear rules were:
"NO UNDERAGE PICS"
"NO CHILD PORNOGRAPHY"
http://nworship.com/forum/index.php?topic=96.0
Where as I don't believe the images themselves are pornographic. Given the captions and context of the site I feel they approach a line. Where that line is I don't know. But I have no desire for some government to demand my IPS records because they decided I visited a site that had child pornography. That would be doubly insulting because I come here to look at pictures of MILF's. In the US the bar is really not that high to be considered child pornography. In parts of the EU the bar is even lower. I believe the bar in the UK it's even lower.
I would really hate for this site to get shut down for a few indiscriminate pictures. But I would not notice, because If we keep posting pictures of underage people I will have to stop visiting this site. It would be a real shame. But, I wont risk having someone search my browser cache and find images I didn't even notice as I was cruising through threads here. I have witnessed what the mere accusation of having child porn can do to someone's life. It ruined the poor guy, and he was innocent. I'd rather take crack, shoot heroin, and be a male interior decorator in Texas. I think it would be safer than to risk being associated with child pornography. You may think I am over reacting. I'm sure people who thought folks leaving when Pompeii started rumbling were over reacting too. There, I've said my piece. I'll let it go now. I did what I think was right. I mentioned that there is a cliff ahead. It's not my job to stop people if they want to keep walking.